Iraq Election Misconceptions and Illusions: Facts and Fatwas……………..
Western (US) media tend to interpret Iraq elections in their own terms. That is especially risky in Iraq, as it is in Lebanon (2009 elections). I wrote about that in an earlier post.
Repeat after me: in a parliamentarian system, the votes “for Allawi” were in fact NOT votes “for him”: they voted for Sunni candidates who were allied with Allawi because they probably were the only, or “the best”, ones available in some areas. It was still unfortunately sectarian, as sectarian as in 2005, Sunnis mostly voting for Sunnis, Shi’as mostly voting for Shi’as. Only the alliances of the candidates were with Allawi or with al-Maliki. The votes were NOT for Allawi or for al-Maliki. They did not necessarily “vote for a non-sectarian” regime: almost all Iraqis still voted along sectarian lines. Oh, and “British-trained” does not necessarily mean he is a democrat. My fatwa still stands: neither al-Maliki not Allawi. It will almost certainly be one of those nominated by Muqtada al-Sadr.
Cheers
mhg
Mon Email




Comments