Political Coups and Counter-Coups in Iraq and “The Nation”, J’accuse………

According to Dreyfuss, all Shi’a politicians who reject a return of the Ba’ath henchmen are “sectarian”.
Interesting how the Western media see Allwi as some kind of a “democrat’, because he has worked with the CIA in the past and travels a lot to Riyadh and Amman, as did many other Iraqis. They seem to overlook the fact that Allawi is the only prominent Shi’a in his coalition (Iraqis are 65% Shi’a, and 15% Kurd), a coalition largely of former and current Ba’athists and a few (Sunni) Islamists like al-Hashemi. He was put thereas a figurehead, a Shi’a token behind whom those that led Iraq into three wars will resume their good work. Dreyfuss also puts himself above the chief of Iraq’ s Federal Court in interpreting the Iraqi constitution: he seems to know more about it or, more likely told by some Arabs, that the chief justice is wrong and the Ba’athits are right.
Oddly, these Dreyfuss views are similar to those of old British colonial administrators like Bell and Cox in 1920. They preferred the “moderate” Sunni minority, and they also thought they were handing Iraq to a “moderate” minority. We know what happened.
My fatwa about Allawi not becoming prime minister still stands, of course, with al-Maliki also on the list for clinging to the office, tentatively.
Cheers
mhg
Mon Email




Comments